If they wanted to make her look computer generated then they would have done it far better since we saw the results with Stuart Little. They decided she should look younger and hipper and tried to make her look like a much younger woman, but they went too far. And that's what I think happened with the IA video. Certain photographers or certain graphic designers are FAR too harsh with the airbrush and take away all of Celine's character and beauty.

She looks like she did in the IA video, totally fake and smoothed out. She still gets airbrushed in her photoshoots, like the shoot in France last year where she is posing with a Guitar. Of course we've seen Celine in her natural state but that has absolutely nothing to do with it so I don't even know why you mentioned that. and it's exactly the same digital effect of Stuart (a digital mouse).īut if you prefer to believe they have tried to airbrush her (maybe she is soooooooo old that just make up doesn't help anymore), believe that!Įdited by Nando Férri, 12 July 2006 - 06:23 PM.ĭo u really think that photoshop is only used for Céline?ĭid I say that anywhere in my post? No, I don't think I did. if you look at the last scenes, on the party's roof, it's the exactly same scenary of the main scenes of the movie, and even the boy besides her, has the same effects of her. but to me, it's very obvious that they try to make her look part of the movie. Sorry my friend, but we don't have confirmation of nothing about her music videos. Who knows! But whatever the REAL reason, they ended up producing the worst video of Celine's career. As far as we know, she could have been airbrushed to make her look younger and more commercially appealing to the kids who see the movie so they would be interested in seeing the video and buying the single. Celine never said that, Sony never said that.no one ever said that. That was only a rumour that some people decided was true.

There was NO confirmation that they wanted her to look digital or computer generated.

I am alive celine dion